steem

Tuesday, August 31, 2021

What Is the True Vaccine Breakthrough Rate? The CDC Doesn’t Want You to Know

Over a recent 12-day period the Milwaukee Brewers had nine players test positive for COVID-19.

While we don’t know the vaccination status of all the players, the team disclosed that most of the players were vaccinated for COVID-19, including former MVP Christian Yelich, who tested positive after experiencing mild flu-like symptoms.

"He did the right thing and reported those mild symptoms," Brewers GM David Stearns said when it was announced Yelich was heading to the disabled list. "We got him a test … .The test returned positive and we got a confirmation test, which also came back positive."

The Brewers are not an isolated example of Major League Baseball teams experiencing a rash of vaccination breakthroughs. Teams across the league have experienced similar problems, including the New York Yankees, who saw nine vaccinated players sidelined in May with COVID-19.

“This is the vaccine working,” CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos at the time, adding that those who tested positive didn’t get a severe infection.

Walensky is correct that data show vaccinated individuals are far less likely to die or become hospitalized with COVID-19 than unvaccinated individuals.

Yet breakthrough cases also appear to be more common than the CDC, media, and public health officials suggest.

CNN says the breakthrough rate is less than one percent, while CBS News reports that 99.7 percent of new COVID cases involve unvaccinated people. The Hill, meanwhile, agrees that CDC data show less than one percent of fully vaccinated people get COVID.

How does this data mesh with anecdotal evidence that suggests many vaccinated people are contracting COVID? To be sure, it’s not just Major League Baseball teams who are seeing spikes of COVID cases among vaccinated individuals.

A recent outbreak in Provincetown, Massachusetts, for example found that the vast majority of COVID cases involved vaccinated individuals.

"Overwhelmingly, the affected individuals have been fully vaccinated for COVID-19,” Town Manager Alex Morse told NBC.

The outbreak, attributed to the rise of the Delta variant, was serious enough to prompt the CDC—which published a report on the outbreak—to reverse its recommendation that vaccinated individuals needn’t wear masks indoors.

But that wasn’t all. The CDC’s study also found, the Washington Post noted, individuals “carried as much virus in their noses as unvaccinated individuals.”

“High viral loads suggest an increased risk of transmission and raised concern that, unlike with other variants, vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus,” Walensky said.

All of this data suggests two important things.

First, COVID cases among vaccinated individuals appear to be higher than the “less than 1 percent” many claim. Two, vaccinated individuals appear quite capable of transmitting the virus to others, as Walensky states. Indeed, viral loads in nasal passages suggest they could transmit the virus at rates similar to unvaccinated carriers.

In the world today, we often hear that data is king. The problem is, the data have been a total mess throughout the pandemic. COVID, the New York Times recently observed, has shown the CDC is utterly broken.

Perhaps because of this, I decided to see how the CDC tracks and defines breakthrough cases.

“As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause,” a statement says. “This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance.”

Does this mean the CDC isn't tracking breakthrough cases anymore unless someone is hospitalized or dies? I asked the CDC for clarification. I didn’t hear back from them.

But if one goes to the CDC site, you’ll find information on vaccine breakthroughs that includes only hospitalizations and deaths. The figure—as of August 2—stands at 7,525, which is below the 9,245 breakthrough infections the CDC had documented as of April 26. (The CDC noted the true rate was higher, due to a lack of surveillance and testing.) Since then, three and a half months have eclipsed and nearly 70 million more people have been vaccinated—and the Delta variant has arrived in force.

Unfortunately, what the actual breakthrough rate is, nobody knows—because the CDC stopped collecting and publishing the data, choosing instead “to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases.”

In making this decision, the CDC arrived at the strange conclusion that public health would be better served by providing the public with less information.

Because of this, the media are left guessing what the breakthrough rate is.

CNN points out that roughly half of US states report data on breakthroughs, and in those states official statistics put the COVID infection rate of vaccinated people at less than 1 percent, “ranging from 0.01% in Connecticut to 0.9% in Oklahoma.”

A highly cited Kaiser report similarly puts the breakthrough rate at “well below” 1 percent.

An NBC News analysis covering 38 states, meanwhile, found 125,682 breakthrough cases, which represents about 0.08 percent of the 164 million vaccinated Americans.

The actual breakthrough rate appears to be much higher than .08 percent based on anecdotal evidence, however, and a more careful perusal of state data.

Let’s start with Major League Baseball. There are about 750 professional ball players on 30 MLB teams. Applying that rate (0.08%) to MLB baseball players would mean we could expect less than one player (0.6) to experience a breakthrough case. A rate of 1 percent would mean 7 or eight players. But as previously mentioned, the New York Yankees alone had nine breakthroughs in May, and many other teams racked up breakthrough cases.

One could argue that perhaps Major League ball players, for some reason we may not yet understand, are more likely to contract the virus after being vaccinated, but plenty of other examples can be found, including the six vaccinated Texas Democrats who tested positive for COVID after taking a charter plane to Washington, DC. Ask yourself this: how many people do you personally know who contracted the virus after being vaccinated? (I know many.)

A thorough review of the evidence strongly suggests breakthrough cases are far likelier than the claims in headlines. A New York Times story published Wednesday exploring the Delta variant—which now accounts for more than half of COVID cases in the US—hinted at this.

The paper noted that the CDC “does not tally national figures on breakthrough infections that don’t result in hospitalization or death,” so the precise incidence “is unknown” even though the CDC says breakthroughs are “extremely rare.”

Seeking comment, the Times received a vague response from Walensky in reply to an email inquiring on breakthrough incidence.

“A modest percentage of people who are fully vaccinated will still get Covid-19 if they are exposed to the virus that causes it,” Dr. Walensky said in reply to a Times email.

But infectious disease experts hinted that breakthrough cases are more likely than the current data suggest. “I think that if we started to test people just randomly on the street, we would find a lot more people who test positive,” Dr. Abraar Karan, an infectious diseases fellow at Stanford, told the newspaper.

On Thursday, New York magazine published an article under the headline “Don’t Panic, But Breakthrough Cases May Be a Bigger Problem Than You’ve Been Told.”

Journalist David Wallace-Wells, who spoke to scientists at Harvard and Scripps’s, said public health officials may be “overstating the vaccine effect on transmission and understating the scale and risk of breakthrough infections.”

“The message that breakthrough cases are exceedingly rare and that you don’t have to worry about them if you’re vaccinated — that this is only an epidemic of the unvaccinated — that message is falling flat,” Harvard epidemiologist Michael Mina told Wallace-Wells.

Eric Topol, an American cardiologist and author, was more blunt, saying he estimated the vaccines’ efficacy against symptomatic transmission had fallen to roughly 60 percent for the Delta variant.

“The breakthrough problem is much more concerning than what our public officials have transmitted,” Topol said.

Wallace-Wells notes it’s impossible to estimate the true breakthrough rate because the CDC stopped tracking and reporting most breakthroughs in May, but the data he assembled paint a much different picture.

“In Delaware, between July 1 and July 22, ‘breakthrough’ cases were 13.8 percent of the total,” he writes. “In Michigan, between June 15 and July 30, the figure was 19.1 percent. In this period, there were 2,369 breakthrough cases and 12,409 in total. In Utah, 8 percent of new cases were breakthroughs in early June, but by late July, as Delta grew, the share grew, too, to 20 percent (even while the total number of cases almost doubled).”

None of this is to say Americans shouldn’t get vaccinated. Evidence suggests it significantly reduces one’s chances of dying of or becoming hospitalized with COVID-19. A New York Times analysis of 40 states found that fully immunized people accounted for less than 6 percent of COVID deaths and less than 5 percent of hospitalizations. (Other data is even more promising, including statistics Dr. Fauci cited in June which claimed 99.2 percent of COVID deaths involved unvaccinated individuals.)

A close loved one of mine was vaccinated this week after I suggested it was a good idea; the same day, I encouraged several other loved ones to get the vaccine. This is not about being “pro-vax” or “anti-vax”; it’s about the CDC not being forthright on vaccine breakthroughs.

Choosing to not count vaccinated people who tested positive for COVID as breakthrough cases is little different than choosing to not count positive COVID cases as actual cases. Imagine how much lower US numbers would be if the CDC stopped tracking cases, and instead only counted deaths and hospitalizations.

The great American writer Mark Twain popularized a well-known saying on stats.

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics," Twain said. (Twain and others attributed the quote to British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli, but it’s unclear if Disraeli ever said this.)

We’ve seen throughout the pandemic how authorities have manipulated statistics to serve their own agendas—most notably New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who changed public health reporting to cover up the number of New Yorkers who died in nursing homes because of his policies.

By only tracking breakthrough infections that result in hospitalization and death, the CDC is depriving the public of crucial information on the efficacy of vaccines and fueling the vaccine wars. Increasingly, these wars are a bipartisan chorus of vaccinated voices who paint the unvaccinated as either crazy people—there are no microchips in it, Times columnist Charles Blow recently quipped—or filthy creatures who are prolonging the pandemic because of their selfishness.

“It's time to start blaming the unvaccinated folks,” Alabama’s Republican Governor Kay Ivey said in July.

Ivey was echoing sentiments President Joe Biden had expressed days earlier.

“Look, the only pandemic we have is among the unvaccinated,” Biden had said while speaking to reporters on the White House lawn.

This chorus has had its desired effect. A recent Axios-Ipsos poll found that 80 percent of Americans blame the unvaccinated for rising cases—even though the US has one of the highest vaccination rates in the world—which has fueled efforts to force Americans to get vaccinated by requiring “vaccine passports” to travel or do business.

Blaming the unvaccinated for the drawn out pandemic may be popular and politically convenient, but as the Times points out, the CDC’s own data suggest that “vaccinated people can carry as much virus in their nose and throat as unvaccinated people.” Moreover, breakthrough transmissions appear to be more common than the CDC has let on—which is undoubtedly why they stopped tracking most breakthrough cases.

The CDC’s effort to hide breakthrough cases not involving death or hospitalization from the public eye might serve its presumed goal—getting more Americans vaccinated—but it undermines the truth and further erodes public trust in government, which is already at historic lows.

The silver lining in the story is that a full analysis of the science of vaccination makes an even stronger case that the decision of whether to vaccinate or not should be made by one person: the individual getting the vaccine.

Jon Miltimore
Jon Miltimore

Jonathan Miltimore is the Managing Editor of FEE.org. His writing/reporting has been the subject of articles in TIME magazine, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Forbes, Fox News, and the Star Tribune.

Bylines: Newsweek, The Washington Times, MSN.com, The Washington Examiner, The Daily Caller, The Federalist, the Epoch Times. 

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

What Is the True Vaccine Breakthrough Rate? The CDC Doesn’t Want You to Know

Vintage Photos - Oestreicher (977-980)

See the previous post in this series here.

I had the opportunity to pick up a huge batch of slides a while back. These are pictures span from as early as the late 1940s to as late as the early 1990s. These came to me second hand but the original source was a combination of estate sales and Goodwill. There are several thousand...maybe as many as 10,000. I will be scanning some from time to time and posting them here for posterity.

Apparently, getting your pictures processed as slides used to be a fairly common thing but it was a phenomenon I missed out on. However, my Grandfather had a few dozen slides (circa late 1950s) that I acquired after he died. That along with having some negatives I wanted to scan is what prompted me to buy a somewhat decent flatbed scanner that could handle slides and negatives, an Epson V600. It can scan up to four slides at a time with various post-processing options and does a decent enough job.

This set continues a rather large batch of slides that originally came from an estate sale and appear to have belonged to a locally well known photographer (or perhaps a friend or family member) from the Spokane Washington area and later Northern Idaho named Leo Oestreicher. He was known for his portrait and landscape photography and especially for post cards. His career started in the 1930s and he died in 1990. These slides contain a lot of landscape and portrait photos but also a lot of photos from day to day life and various vacations around the world. Here's an article on him from 1997 which is the only info I have found on him: http://www.spokesman.com/stories/1997/jan/04/photos-of-a-lifetime-museum-acquisition-of-leo/

Many of these slides had the date they were processed stamped or printed on them. I've found that in cases where I could verify the date, either because a more specific date was hand written or there was something to specifically date the photo in the photo itself, that this date has typically been the same month the photos were taken. In other words, I expect that in MOST cases these photos were taken relatively near the processing date.

Click on one of the images or the link below to also see versions processed with color restoration and Digital ICE which is a hardware based dust and scratch remover, a feature of the Epson V600 scanner I am using. There are also versions processed with the simpler dust removal option along with color restoration.

Proving once again that cat pics were popular long before the internet, here are several from the early 1970s.


Processed July 1973


Processed October 1971

Processed October 1971

The entire collection that has been scanned and uploaded so far can also be found here.

Friday, August 27, 2021

Nintendo Magazine System – Issue Number 8

Nintendo Magazine System – Issue Number 8

Nintendo Magazine System was published in several countries and was the official Nintendo magazine in at least some of them. This particular one was published in Britain. Issue number 8 includes:

Features

  • Cover Story - A cross between Alien Syndrome and countless space-bound horror films, Operation Logic Bomb blasts its way here for an exclusive NMS review. With loads to shoot, and loads of weaponry with which to do so, how does it fare?

  • Exhaust Heat II - Just when you thought racing games couldn't get any faster, here come Seta with a game so fast it leaves scorch marks on your screen! Forget F-Zero, forget Exhaust Heat. The latest and greatest race game is for your Super NES - and we give it the full Mansell treatment...

  • NMS Goes To The Movies
  • - Lights, camera - and ACTION! With the likes of Batman Returns, Cool World and Lethal Weapon reviewed this very issue, we decided to lump them all together in a special section! So, buy yourself a large bucket of popcorn, irritate people by getting out of your seat and moving along the aisle every five minutes, and keep rustling a jumbo bag of salt and vinegar crisps whenever possible...

Regulars

  • News - Big Arnie returns for another bout of Nintendo mayhem as Sony sign up the rights to his new movie, The Last Action Hero! Meanwhile Sylvester Stallone is set to hit the Super NES in a game based on his new film, Cliffhanger. Cripes! There's all this and lots, lots more as we scour the world for all the tidbits of gossip you want to read.

  • Seal's Mailbag - Arf, arf! Reeking of fish and suitably bewhiskered, SEAL returns for another bout of letter answering. However, if you really want to get on his good side, send him tins of sardines with your letter - it's almost certain to get in then. Oh, and chocolate. He really likes chocolate. And crisps. And Toffee...

  • NHS: Nintendo Help System - Like Florence Nightingale did to countless soldiers all those years back, NMS cools the fevered brows of you struggling players out there. This month, Prince Of Persia and Alfred Chicken are dissected by our hand-picked team of butchers...sorry surgeons, and their innermost secret removed and placed in specimen jars for your delectation. All this and Small Tips, too. Blimey!

  • Will You Ever? - After revealing in our own, inimitable way the end of Axelay last month, this time we reveal what happens at the end of Super Mario World! That's right, after the Mario has leapt on to Bowser for the very last time, and all that Mode 7-type related malarkey with the spiky one zooming in and out of the screen has gone, this is what happens...

  • High Scores - Is your sad fizzog featured within these hallowed pages? No, then get playing your fave game, attain a marvelous score, send us a dippy picture, and then wait for us to mock you in the next issue - all in harmless fun, of course.

  • Charts - Rockadoodledoo, Pop Pickers, it's charteroony time! As well as the official Super NES, NES, and Game Boy charts, there's the all-important NMS team chart where we scrap amongst ourselves just to get our favorite titles in there. Ah, so that explains why Kirby keeps making all those comebacks...

  • Blagman - Another new idea, and rather a daft one if we do say so ourselves. Blagman is King Scrap, without a doubt. If there is an industry freebie, this Robin Hood of the software industry is there to pinch it and distribute it amongst the needy and greedy. This month, Acclaim's offices have been stripped bare of all manner of goodies, as the masked wonder offers a massive selection of poached freebies. If you want one, get writing...

  • Index - Ah, the Game Boy, How do we love thee? Let us count the ways. What a beautiful little device. So beautiful in fact that we have acquired the services of the lovely Sarah Ewing, EMAP beauty expert and Game Boy fan to deliver THE ultimate in looks tips and Game Boy info. What's more, every Game Boy title under the sun is listed for your delectation. There's never been anything quite like it, which is probably just as well...

Super NES Reviews

  • Exhaust Heat II
  • Tuff E Nuff
  • Super James Pond
  • Outlander
  • Batman Returns
  • Cool World
  • The Terminator
  • Operation Logic Bomb
  • Shanghai II

NES Reviews

  • Pugsly's Scavenger Hunt
  • Lethal Weapon
  • James Pond II: Robocod
  • Mr Gimmick

Game Boy Reviews

  • Universal Soldier
  • Lethal Weapon

Previews

  • Alien 3
  • Terminator II
  • Striker
  • Biometal
  • Crash Dummies

Tips

  • Small Tips
  • Prince of Persia
  • Alfred Chicken

...and more!

Wednesday, August 25, 2021

Commodore Format (July 1995)

Commodore Format (July 1995)

Those in the U.S. might find it hard to believe, but Commodore Format was a Commodore 64 magazine that was still being published in the U.K. in 1995. This issue from July 1995 includes:

Features

  • News special: C64 reborn! - ESCOM, the second largest European PC manufacturers are to relaunch the C64 in the developing countries. Simon Forrester gets out his atlas and looks at the implications of this announcement.

  • Win!Win!Win! - Take yourself to the edge, a very sharp edge. We have five copies of the spectacular beat'-em-up Sword of Honour to give away. Turn to page 8 to see how to win a copy NOW!

  • 1993 and all that - No sooner said than spun. Your favorite Commodore story teller, Simon Forrester, sits himself under a tree, takes out his big picture book and begins... Once upon a time... And all because one curious CF reader asked Simon to tell him more about the history of the C64.

  • On The Powerpack
    • Capture - Simply board Capture may be, but it's never dull. Capture is a game of strategy and skill. Move your tiles around: preferably on to squares which are already occupied by your opponent. Well, do you have any cause to be nice to him or her?
    • Trashman

Regulars

  • News/C64 Scene Directory - Did you win a JiffyDOS upgrade? A Shoot-'em-up-destruction Set? And, what's the C64-wise?
  • The Mighty Brain - You ask. We give as good as we get. No, better.
  • Back to BASICs - You are under mortarboard attack from Simon Forrester who is determined to teach you BASIC.
  • Buy-a-rama - Sold on the idea of CF classifieds? You should be!
  • Contact points - The fanzines, the clubs, the lowdown.
  • Next month: - What you can look forward to in CF59.
  • CF back issues - Keep up with the issues that were.

Reviews

  • Sword of Honour - It's spectacular. It's a beat-'em-up. It's got ninjas.

Games

  • Gamebusters - Squarescape, Superstrike, Spacewar and SEUDS.
  • Public Domain - Succumb to Lethargy and Contraflow.

Serious

  • GEOS - Go faster gripes? You can speed up your printing.
  • True ROM-antics - TALK, LISTEN, UNTALK, UNLISTEN.
  • Techie Tips - Stuck? Glue yourself to techie guru Jason Finch.

...and more!

Exposed: Anti-Cryptocurrency Congressman Brad Sherman Gets Biggest Donations From Big Banks

Millions of Americans have bought into forms of digital, decentralized money known as cryptocurrency, valuing its privacy and independence from government meddling. Naturally, politicians in Washington want to rain on the parade and shut down the newfangled currencies— like Bitcoin and Ethereum—that are beyond their control. 

One of the biggest opponents of cryptocurrency in Washington is Congressman Brad Sherman, a California Democrat who has in the past called for cryptos to be banned. At a Wednesday hearing for the House Committee on Financial Services, Sherman harshly criticized cryptocurrency and renewed his calls for its prohibition.

“Cryptocurrency is something you can bet on, but if people want to have the animal spirits to take risks, I’d prefer them to invest in equity markets to support the building of American companies, or the California lottery, to support the schools in my state,” Sherman said. “Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile, so if one person makes a million dollars… and nine lose $100,000, Coinbase makes money, the millionaire goes on TV and says how wonderful it is, and nine others do not retire in dignity.” 

The congressman also claimed that “evading the know-your-customer-rule is the one thing cryptocurrencies have as an advantage to the US dollar.”

“Cryptocurrencies have the political support of the ‘patriotic’ anarchists who are rooting for tax evasion,” Sherman concluded. “I hope we shut it down.” (Emphasis added). 

The California congressman gets so much wrong here that it’s difficult to know where to begin.

For one, Sherman seems to think that his personal views on how to invest money should be superimposed on all Americans. Simply put, the congressman and his Washington pals think they know better, and little people like you or me are too foolish to make these decisions for ourselves. This is not only arrogant but incorrect. 

You and I have infinitely more knowledge and familiarity with our own financial situation—acceptable levels of risk, investment goals, etc.—than detached politicians and bureaucrats could ever have. It logically follows that we will make better decisions for ourselves than if a top-down, one-size-fits-all approach is crammed down on us from Washington. 

(I mean, the congressman is telling people they should put their money in the California lottery, and the odds for the “Grand Prize” are about 1 in 41.4 million. We’re supposed to trust his financial advice?) 

Moreover, Sherman’s rhetoric about a select few cryptocurrency winners getting rich off the backs of losers is a classic example of the “zero-sum fallacy.” It’s economically untrue that wealth gains must necessarily come from someone else’s losses. Indeed, when transactions are voluntary, they must inherently serve both parties' interests. (If they didn’t, the parties wouldn’t agree to it!) So, the picture the congressman paints of cryptocurrency as exploitation is by no stretch of the imagination the reality. People can gain value without others always having to lose. 

Sherman also misstates the differences between cryptocurrency and the US dollar. He overlooks the key difference: cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are beyond central control, and their price cannot be inflated by a central authority. However, the US dollar can be inflated by the Federal Reserve when it prints new money.  (In fact, that's exactly what's happening right now).

Why does someone with such dubious and ill-informed views on cryptocurrency want to superimpose his judgment on the entire country via government bans? Well, it’s no doubt due in part to the natural arrogance that plagues humans (especially those who become politicians).

But there’s also a more cynical, yet simple answer: Some of Congressman Sherman’s biggest donors are big banks and mainstream financial institutions, the same interests threatened by the rise of cryptocurrency.

According to OpenSecrets.org, the following financial companies rank among Congressman Sherman’s biggest donors to his 2020 Campaign Committee:

  • Capital Group Companies: $18,400
  • Blackstone Group: $16,800
  • BlackRock Inc: $11,250
  • American Bankers Association: $10,000
  • Capital One Financial: $10,000
  • Charles Schwab Corp: $10,000
  • Credit Union National Association: $10,000
  • Discover Financial Services: $10,000
  • Deloitte LLP: $10,000

This offers some insight into why Sherman persists in seeking to ban cryptocurrency. Sure, such a restriction would deprive his constituents of the freedom to make their own investment decisions and shield their finances from stealth taxation via inflation. But it would serve the interests of Sherman’s biggest donors—and it seems like that’s what really matters to the congressman.

Like this story? Click here to sign up for the FEE Daily and get free-market news and analysis like this from Policy Correspondent Brad Polumbo in your inbox every weekday. 

Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo

Brad Polumbo (@Brad_Polumbo) is a libertarian-conservative journalist and Policy Correspondent at the Foundation for Economic Education.

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

Exposed: Anti-Cryptocurrency Congressman Brad Sherman Gets Biggest Donations From Big Banks

Vintage Photos - Oestreicher (973-976)

See the previous post in this series here.

I had the opportunity to pick up a huge batch of slides a while back. These are pictures span from as early as the late 1940s to as late as the early 1990s. These came to me second hand but the original source was a combination of estate sales and Goodwill. There are several thousand...maybe as many as 10,000. I will be scanning some from time to time and posting them here for posterity.

Apparently, getting your pictures processed as slides used to be a fairly common thing but it was a phenomenon I missed out on. However, my Grandfather had a few dozen slides (circa late 1950s) that I acquired after he died. That along with having some negatives I wanted to scan is what prompted me to buy a somewhat decent flatbed scanner that could handle slides and negatives, an Epson V600. It can scan up to four slides at a time with various post-processing options and does a decent enough job.

This set continues a rather large batch of slides that originally came from an estate sale and appear to have belonged to a locally well known photographer (or perhaps a friend or family member) from the Spokane Washington area and later Northern Idaho named Leo Oestreicher. He was known for his portrait and landscape photography and especially for post cards. His career started in the 1930s and he died in 1990. These slides contain a lot of landscape and portrait photos but also a lot of photos from day to day life and various vacations around the world. Here's an article on him from 1997 which is the only info I have found on him: http://www.spokesman.com/stories/1997/jan/04/photos-of-a-lifetime-museum-acquisition-of-leo/

Many of these slides had the date they were processed stamped or printed on them. I've found that in cases where I could verify the date, either because a more specific date was hand written or there was something to specifically date the photo in the photo itself, that this date has typically been the same month the photos were taken. In other words, I expect that in MOST cases these photos were taken relatively near the processing date.

Click on one of the images or the link below to also see versions processed with color restoration and Digital ICE which is a hardware based dust and scratch remover, a feature of the Epson V600 scanner I am using. There are also versions processed with the simpler dust removal option along with color restoration.

The last two photos were processed in September 1964 and are from a fishing trip. The others are undated and unlabeled. The 2nd shows a picnic and could be from the same trip while the first looks like an overhead shot of a beach.





Processed September 1964

Processed September 1964

The entire collection that has been scanned and uploaded so far can also be found here.

Tuesday, August 24, 2021

VideoGames: The Ultimate Gaming Magazine (February 1994)

VideoGames: The Ultimate Gaming Magazine (February 1994)

VideoGames: The Ultimate Gaming Magazine was a revamp of VideoGames & Computer Entertainment. However, I always felt it was a much worse magazine. VG&CE was one of my favorites whereas the new iteration was a GamePro wannabe. Still, all magazines from this era were pretty enjoyable...even this one. The February 1994 issue includes:

News

  • Input - Are Video-Game Cheats for Wimps?
  • Press Start - News, Rumors, Reader Mail, Information, Top 10

Previews

  • Super Wing
  • Time Killers
  • Brutal
  • Bubsy II
  • Double Switch
  • Goofy's Hysterical History Tour
  • Marvel Comics' X-Men
  • Barney's Hide & Seek Game
  • Fireteam Rogue
  • Formula 1 Grand Prix
  • Sub-Terrania

Tips & Tricks

  • Mortal Kombat
  • Jurassic Park
  • Sunset Riders
  • Exile: Wicked Phenomenon
  • F-1 Pole Position
  • Stellar 7: Draxon's Revenge
  • Kendo Rage

Strategy Guide

  • Zombies Ate My Neighbors
  • General Chaos

Reviews

  • NBA Jam
  • TMNT: Tournament Fighters
  • Legend
  • Lunar the Silver Star
  • Beauty and the Beast
  • Thunderstrike
  • Eternal Champions
  • Blades of Vengeance
  • RoboCop 3
  • Popeye 2
  • Pinball Dreams
  • Total Carnage
  • Cybermorph
  • Rescue Ranger
  • Micro Reviews

Other Cool Stuff

  • NBA Jam Pullout Section
  • The History of Street Fighter
  • SportsWire - Sports games news, reviews, previews and more!
  • Global Gaming - International games from abroad!

...and more!

Wednesday, August 18, 2021

Commodore Format (May 1995)

Commodore Format (May 1995)

Commodore Format was a popular but very late magazine dedicated to the Commodore 64 published in the U.K. The first issue was not published until late 1990. However, despite this, it had a relatively long life lasting well into the mid 1990s. The May 1995 issue includes:

Features

  • Get animated! - Inside everyone there's a budding Walt Disney. Untap your hidden potential

  • Grin and repair it! Part II - Do you run to the casualty department with a cold? Do you ignore gaping, gushing wounds? Course not! Jason Finch talks you through diagnosing a sick C64, assessing the gravity of the situation and suggests remedial action - where appropriate.

Reviews

  • Games arena - Andy Roberts straps on his ungainly yet protective reviewer's helmet to visit the unpredictable world of the latest C64 games.

  • Be calculating! - GEOS is a neat windows and menus-based system, but what's it like to actually work with? Andrew Fisher brings you GeoCalc and shows you how powerful and easy it really is.

Games

  • Games round-up II - Andy Roberts sorts the wheat from the chaff, and eventually sees the wood for the trees.

  • Public Domain - The world of all-you-can-get-for-almost-nothing. Andy Roberts goes in and returns, triumphant.

Serious

  • True ROM-antics - Baffled by the error messages. Read this.

  • Techie tips - Problem plus Jason Finch equals solution.

Regulars

  • C64 News - Info from the around the C64 world, presented in bite-sized chunks just for you.

  • The Mighty Brain / C64 Directory - Your letters, TMB's replies. Also your one-stop guide to whom to contact, C64-speaking.

  • Well 'ard III - RAMLink - store/load/access data quicker.

  • Buy-a-rama - Buy, sell or just simply interact with your peers.

  • Contact Points - Clubs and essential reading for C64 users.

  • On The Powerpack...
    • Frost - Learn to animate with this powerful, yet easy-to-use utility. It's neat, fast and your imagination is the only limit, almost.
    • Harrier - Flying a jump jet has never been such fun, especially during war.
    • Space War - 3D blasting action is all yours in this fun game.
    • Superstrike - Trigger finger not tired yet? Then try this manic shoot-'em-up for size. But wait a minute - no one's saying it's going to be easy.
    • Darkest Road (Part II) - Darkest Road is a chilling fantasy text adventure which is sure to set your pulse a-rattlin' and your brain a-thinkin'.

...and more!

The Progressive Case for Cryptocurrency

Editor’s Note: This is a follow-up article to “The Conservative Case for Cryptocurrency.”

There are two basic types of progressives. One type’s primary objectives are to reduce social power imbalances and help lift up the least advantaged in society. The other type simply wants to control political power hierarchies to engineer society.

In making a progressive case for cryptocurrency, then, it’s important to appeal to the former type. Some progressives who claim to stand for the poor unwittingly support the hierarchies that cause poverty. One such hierarchy is the big one behind the US dollar.

The dollar is not just a piece of paper. It symbolizes a system. And that system benefits the wealthy by design. The Federal Reserve—the Bank of Banks that controls the money supply—actually has the power to tax, in a way. But that taxation power is wholly undemocratic, unaccountable, and falls disproportionately upon the poor.

It’s called inflation.

As Austrian economists define it, inflation is the practice of printing money out of thin air, which robs the people of their purchasing power. True progressives shouldn’t tolerate the practice because it ends up harming hard-working people, especially the poor.

Source: FRED/Wikipedia

Inflation amounts to a kind of perverse redistribution from poor to rich, because the redistribution works in service of the central banks and their friends in the financial sector. Obviously, inflation works to the advantage of governments, too, not to mention favor seekers who depend on debt spending.

As Dion Rabuoin writes at Axios:

“The Fed-driven economy relies on the creation of trillions of dollars — literally out of thin air — that are used to purchase bonds and push money into a pandemic-ravaged economy that has long been dependent on free cash and is only growing more addicted.”

The problem is that most of these resources stay at the top of the income distribution. Whether in large corporations or in banks, the wealthiest eat first and leave very few scraps. Today much of the inflation shows up as asset prices such as stocks. Otherwise, it shows up in higher prices for food and building materials.

“We are seeing very substantial inflation,” said Warren Buffett recently. Of course, such inflation originates in the central bank’s response to exorbitant federal spending.

This bizarre reality creates cognitive dissonance for some progressives who think the government can do no wrong. But whether we’re talking about missile makers, mega-corporations, or millionaires drawing Medicare from the public trough, there are very few angels writing all those checks in red ink.

Over time, inflation robs the working poor of their meager savings, as day by day every dollar buys less. It’s no wonder, then, that many poor people turn to the very same banks that benefit from inflationary policies. Most end up deep in debt. Thus, when progressives say that capitalism is a system that exploits the poor to benefit the rich, they are right—at least when “capitalism” is defined as a system with central banking at its heart.

But if we’re all locked in the dollar’s matrix, how is a true progressive to make change?

One way is to adopt cryptocurrencies. Now, I don’t mean any particular cryptocurrency. Some progressives don’t like bitcoin, for example, because its security protocols make high energy demands. Other cryptocurrencies will emerge that make fewer such demands but preserve the security of decentralization.

Now, we’ve all witnessed token traders salivating in speculative greed. This has put some progressives off of cryptocurrencies to the point that it’s hard for them to view these innovations as any sort of saving grace. But when we consider that most cryptocurrencies gain purchasing power over time, we will come to see that—despite speculation—they are an escape from a system that is robbing them.

Since we’re still in the early days of popular adoption, price volatility is an unfortunate byproduct of crypto. In time, though, the volatility is likely to settle down. Some cryptocurrencies, known as “stablecoins” are designed to be, well, stable. (We can also imagine cryptocurrency Index Funds with their own more stable tokens, sort of like a mutual fund, which is less volatile than a single stock.) People will start to understand their cryptocurrency both as an appreciating asset and as money, especially when more and more vendors accept cryptocurrency.

But wait. Can lower-income populations really afford to get into crypto?

First, we should define our terms. It’s not perfect, but “low-income” is generally a group of people who can scrape up some disposable income if they’re disciplined. Let’s use Pew Research’s definition, which is anything below two-thirds of the median household income.

Now, anyone who studies poverty knows that it’s expensive to be low-income in America. For example, lower-income folks tend to pay higher overdraft fees, ATM withdrawal fees, and interest rates than the rest of us for various reasons. For better or worse, low-income folks frequently also shop at convenience stores to satisfy many of their wants and needs. Convenience stores charge more on average for so many of the things people buy, whether it’s coffee and doughnuts, cigarettes and vapes, or candy and Monster soda. And it’s not a stretch to think that many low-income people spend $4.00 per day on average for stuff that brings them short-term pleasure, but that they probably don’t need.

What if a low-income person could forgo enough convenient-store junk to adopt some crypto? Let’s say $100 per month.

Now, some might argue that it’s the essence of ‘privilege’ to suggest that lower-income people buy cryptocurrencies. Indeed, at the moment, you more or less have to have a bank account to do so. (And that’s a fair point.) Yet we can’t make perfect the enemy of the good, particularly when we know that people in much poorer countries, such as Venezuela and Lebanon, find a way—especially as people in these poorer countries are experiencing hyperinflation.

So let’s go back to the idea of foregoing $100 per month in convenience-store spending and present a set of options to low-income people.

What would happen if someone adopted $100 per month of a cryptocurrency with a 3 percent increase in purchasing power over 10 years (as opposed to a 3 percent decrease caused by inflation) and saved it? How much would their crypto be worth after 10 years? You can do the math, but the short answer is this: it’s a lot.

Progressives concerned about poverty alleviation—think Sen. Elizabeth Warren or Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—should give cryptos a closer look. One of the most effective ways to help low-income people and challenge predatory hierarchies is not to agitate for more debt spending by governments, but instead to create a popular movement in cryptocurrency adoption by the least advantaged.

At the very least, some would be able to form a nest egg that is not really possible in the predatory environments after 2008, in which the taxpayers bailed out the banks and the people continue to live on dollars worth less and less each year.

But that’s not all. Cryptocurrencies have the potential to improve the lot of low-income groups by:

  • Providing a means of cheaper remittances between hard-working poor people in rich countries to their friends and family in poor countries.
  • Allowing people to bypass intermediaries who might privilege another group over them.
  • Providing direct, equal access to gaining capital and assets
  • Providing direct, equal access to trustful systems and global markets.
  • Providing direct, equal access to legitimating, auditable properties such as identity, provenance, and consensus systems, such as voting.

Cryptocurrencies are still in their infancy, but they have the power to reduce power imbalances and help lift up the least advantaged in society. Indeed, given how many beneficial properties they have, and how they can function as a hedge against inflation alone, the case for cryptocurrencies makes itself.

Max Borders
Max Borders

Max Borders is author of The Social Singularity. He is also the founder and Executive Director of Social Evolution—a non-profit organization dedicated to liberating humanity through innovation. Max is also co-founder of the Voice & Exit event and former editor at the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE). Max is a futurist, a theorist, a published author and an entrepreneur.

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

TThe Progressive Case for Cryptocurrency

Vintage Photos - Oestreicher (969-972)

See the previous post in this series here.

I had the opportunity to pick up a huge batch of slides a while back. These are pictures span from as early as the late 1940s to as late as the early 1990s. These came to me second hand but the original source was a combination of estate sales and Goodwill. There are several thousand...maybe as many as 10,000. I will be scanning some from time to time and posting them here for posterity.

Apparently, getting your pictures processed as slides used to be a fairly common thing but it was a phenomenon I missed out on. However, my Grandfather had a few dozen slides (circa late 1950s) that I acquired after he died. That along with having some negatives I wanted to scan is what prompted me to buy a somewhat decent flatbed scanner that could handle slides and negatives, an Epson V600. It can scan up to four slides at a time with various post-processing options and does a decent enough job.

This set continues a rather large batch of slides that originally came from an estate sale and appear to have belonged to a locally well known photographer (or perhaps a friend or family member) from the Spokane Washington area and later Northern Idaho named Leo Oestreicher. He was known for his portrait and landscape photography and especially for post cards. His career started in the 1930s and he died in 1990. These slides contain a lot of landscape and portrait photos but also a lot of photos from day to day life and various vacations around the world. Here's an article on him from 1997 which is the only info I have found on him: http://www.spokesman.com/stories/1997/jan/04/photos-of-a-lifetime-museum-acquisition-of-leo/

Many of these slides had the date they were processed stamped or printed on them. I've found that in cases where I could verify the date, either because a more specific date was hand written or there was something to specifically date the photo in the photo itself, that this date has typically been the same month the photos were taken. In other words, I expect that in MOST cases these photos were taken relatively near the processing date.

Click on one of the images or the link below to also see versions processed with color restoration and Digital ICE which is a hardware based dust and scratch remover, a feature of the Epson V600 scanner I am using. There are also versions processed with the simpler dust removal option along with color restoration.

This set contains interior and exterior shots of probably two different houses. While the photos are undated, the small TV, microwave and touch tone phone in the last photo indicates they were probably taken in the early 1980s timeframe.






The entire collection that has been scanned and uploaded so far can also be found here.

Tuesday, August 17, 2021

PSM (November 1997)

PSM (November 1997)

PSM was probably the most popular magazine dedicated to the PlayStation in the U.S. The November 1997 issue includes:

Cover Story

  • MegaMania! - The little blue guy is back, and in a mighty big way with two new games! We've got the scoop on Neo, Mega Man's first 3D adventure, plus the full review and tip card for Mega Man X4!

Features

  • Accessorize Your PlayStation! Part 2 - After we managed to dig our poor Noah out of that giant pile, we found even more things for you to plug into your PlayStation!

  • Final Fantasy VII Stuff Ya Don't Know - What's that? You haven't slept since you bought FFVII, and you've already played all the way through? Bet you didn't find everything...

  • Armored Core: Build the Best Mech - Producer's Advanced Tips - That's right - we've got the top three designs of Armored Core's U.S. producer, so get ready to wreak some serious havoc!

  • Colon Wars - The Ultimate Resource Guide - Where to go, what to do, and how to get there - we've covered it all in this comprehensive guide to the amazing Colony Wars universe. You're now on your way to becoming a master pilot in League of Free Worlds!
  • PlayStation Party! - Call your friends and clear out some space - it's time for a PlayStation party! We've got all the pro party tips for turning a night of just sitting around into a wild time to remember, so let's get it started!

Monitor

  • Feature Story: Tokyo Game Show
  • Yaroze News
  • Gossip
  • Nihon Game Otaku!

Reviews

  • Flashback
  • Backlog

Previews

  • Mega Man Neo
  • Monster Rancher
  • NBA Live '98
  • Shadow Master
  • Crash 2
  • Gex 2
  • CART World Series
  • Jet Moto 2
  • Resident Evil 2
  • MDK
  • Youngblood
  • Cool Boarders 2
  • Fighting Force
  • Tomb Raider 2
  • Critical Depth

Code Junkies

  • The latest codes for all you addicts

Letters

  • Link-Up
  • Top This!
  • PS
  • Marketplace

Reset

  • A sneak peak at what's gonna be hot for next month

...and more!

Tuesday, August 10, 2021

ACE: Advanced Computer Entertainment (June 1988)

ACE: Advanced Computer Entertainment (June 1988)

ACE, which stood for Advanced Computer Entertainment, is a computer gaming magazine that was published in the U.K. that covered gaming on the various computer systems available at the time (1988 in this case). North Americans would find many of these computers familiar, such as the Atari ST, Commodore 64, and Amiga but others like the Spectrum and Amstrad were more euro-centric. The June 1988 issue includes:

American Issue

  • Cover Cassette - Mission Impossible - Full loading instructions for our fabulous four-computer free cassette of the all-time classic Epyx game.

  • Inventing the future - The American Revolution started in Boston; now another revolution's under way as the boffins of the Media Lab explore the possibilities of computer-to-human interaction.

  • Console Crazy - 4.5 million Nintendo owners can't be wrong; we check out the stateside console scene.

  • Simulation Success... - Spectrum Holobyte's brilliant Falcon has won just about every award the Software Publisher's Association had to gihttp://www.megalextoria.comve away. We visited their San Francisco lair to see what other goodies they're cooking up.

  • CD Interactive - the future of games? - We've heard a lot of talk, but what is CDI all about? Research & Development teams from Electronic Arts, Activision and Lucasfilm show us what it might look like and predict the future.

  • Multi-user U.S.A. - Comms is big, big, big in America. We survey the scene and bring you an in-depth report on Air Warrior - the ultimate in multi-user, real-time air combat.

Specials

  • The Third Dimension - No 3D specs needed! ACE takes you right into the screen, to explore the best in isometric 3D games, including such gems as Batman and Knight Lore.

  • The Creation - Adventure creators have been around for some time. We look at their background and future, and investigate Incentive's ST Adventure Creator. Is STAC the best of the bunch?

Interface

  • News - Dragon's Lair on your ST? We investigate Microdeal's interactive laser disk system. FTL interviewed in San Diego...exclusive interaction with the team that brought you Dungeon Master and Oids.

  • Previews - Hot stuff coming your way real soon now.

  • Letters - Would you believe it? - they're still writing in about the great Piracy controversy - this one will run and run.

  • The Blitter End - We name the winners, and tell a sad tale of what skateboarding can do to OAPs...

Gameplay

  • Screen Test - Staggering stuff this month in the zippiest, most authoritative games review section around. Get a load of the latest Archie game Conqueror and Rainbird's stunning Carrier Command.

  • Arcade Ace - We review Blasteroids, son of Asteroids, yet another old-timer attempting a 1980s comeback.

  • Updates Special - Ace flight sim Falcon finally makes it over here on the PC, perplexing puzzler Deflektor bamboozles its way on to the ST.

  • Play By Mail - Reviews of Speculate and Crisis, plus latest news from the world of PBM.

  • Tricks 'n' Tactics - Dungeon Master - the complete players' guide, including map of the hall of Champions, a list of extremely useful spells, and a map of the first level. Plus our usual plethora of pokes for the games that need a little attitude adjustment.
...and more!

The Federal Reserve is Embracing Left-Wing Policies—Here’s Why You Shouldn’t Be Surprised

The Federal Reserve System has come under fire in the last few months for extending itself into areas outside its Congressional “dual mandate” of stabilizing prices and maximizing employment. There are two areas where the Fed is being accused of overreaching.

The first area is economic equality. For example, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York website greets visitors with a message stating, “we are firm in the belief that economic equality is a critical component for social justice.” Senator Pat Toomey recently sent letters to several Regional Federal Reserve Banks criticizing this policy pursuit of economic equality as, “wholly unrelated to the Federal Reserve’s statutory mandate.”

The second area, environmental policy, has also become a more central focus. Economist Alex Salter reports that the Fed recently created two climate committees and joined a group dedicated to making the financial system more environmentally focused. And, although Chairman Jerome Powell says the Fed isn’t trying to set climate policy, a report out of Reuters alleges that the Fed has begun to pressure banks to assess climate risk.

As a result of this public shift, Salter has published an open letter with 42 distinguished co-signatories expressing concern. The letter’s author and co-signers are bothered by the Fed’s mission creep, and call for the Fed to focus on monetary policy and money, rather than activism.

While this concern is well-placed, it’s important to note that the Fed abandoning political independence is nothing new. The Fed has a long history of breaching its political independence “norms.”

Perhaps the most famous example of this was when then-President Richard Nixon pressured Fed Chairman Arthur Burns into crafting monetary policy in a way that would help his re-election. A recorded conversation between the two has Nixon laughing about the idea of political independence:

“‘I know there’s the myth of the autonomous Fed . . .” Nixon barked a quick laugh. “...and when you go up for confirmation some Senator may ask you about your friendship with the President. Appearances are going to be important, so you can call Ehrlichman to get messages to me, and he’ll call you.’”

However, the Fed hasn’t only been beholden to politicians—special interest groups also appear to have power over the Fed. After the 2008 financial crisis, a new wave of bank regulators was sent to deal with large financial institutions such as JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs. One regulator sent by the New York Fed, Carmen Segarra, released recorded conversations between herself, her supervisors at the New York Fed, and officials at Goldman Sachs.

In the conversations, Segarra is urged by her supervisors at the Fed to change her report suggesting Goldman Sachs had an insufficient policy for dealing with conflicts of interest. When she refused, Segarra was fired by the Fed.

Although being urged to change her report may be the most egregious example, the common theme in the tapes is clear: the Fed regulators seem more like partners of Goldman Sachs than watchdogs.

The takeaway is clear. The Fed has a storied history of political corruption, and this shouldn’t be surprising.

To understand why we should expect corruption from the Fed we need to consider the lessons of Public Choice economics.

Public Choice looks at politics as an exchange. Bureaucrats, politicians, and political appointees, for example, want things like good jobs after retirement, funding for political projects, and valuable relationships with powerful people. In order to obtain these things, these political actors may be willing to craft policies to benefit special interest groups or other politicians.

Consider, for example, the Fed. One of the powers the Fed has is the ability to print new money. When a new 100 dollar bill is printed, the first person to receive the new money will be able to use it to buy real goods and services. If they buy a TV, for example, the new 100 dollar bill goes to the person who sold the TV. However, as the new dollar bill is spent more and more, the increased demand it creates leads to higher prices, everything else held constant.

So while the first people to get the new money get a good deal, it leads to higher prices for everyone else. Inflation is like a hidden tax on whoever gets new money after the prices have risen. Receiving new money first, then, is a privilege that some may be willing to pay for. If it only costs you $90 to lobby the Fed for a new 100 dollar bill, you come out $10 richer.

Printing money isn’t only beneficial for those who receive the money first, though. As the example of president Nixon highlighted, politicians focused on short-term re-election goals may be interested in giving favors, privileges, or punishments to members of the Fed in order to improve the economy before an election.

Finally, the Fed’s regulatory role in banks is another “asset” special interests would like to purchase. The Segarra tapes show a clear example of how powerful special interest groups can use their influence to control the regulations within their industry. Economists call this “regulatory capture.”

So, although I ultimately agree with Salter’s open letter, it’s important to recognize that what’s happening isn’t very new. The Fed has long been involved in pursuing goals other than monetary stability. The only new development is the mask is dropping. The Fed is now being more transparent about its other activities.

And while I’d like to believe we can reign in the Fed and convince its members to follow rules, I’m not so sure. The Fed, as an institution, has the ability to transfer enormous amounts of wealth from some groups to others in the form of inflation and regulation. Given the enormity of these transfers, it seems unlikely that self-interested politicians will be willing to give up that power any time soon.

Peter Jacobsen
Peter Jacobsen

Peter Jacobsen is an Assistant Professor of Economics at Ottawa University and the Gwartney Professor of Economic Education and Research at the Gwartney Institute. He received his PhD in economics from George Mason University, and obtained his BS from Southeast Missouri State University. His research interest is at the intersection of political economy, development economics, and population economics. 

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

The Federal Reserve is Embracing Left-Wing Policies—Here’s Why You Shouldn’t Be Surprised

Vintage Photos - Oestreicher (965-968)

See the previous post in this series here.

I had the opportunity to pick up a huge batch of slides a while back. These are pictures span from as early as the late 1940s to as late as the early 1990s. These came to me second hand but the original source was a combination of estate sales and Goodwill. There are several thousand...maybe as many as 10,000. I will be scanning some from time to time and posting them here for posterity.

Apparently, getting your pictures processed as slides used to be a fairly common thing but it was a phenomenon I missed out on. However, my Grandfather had a few dozen slides (circa late 1950s) that I acquired after he died. That along with having some negatives I wanted to scan is what prompted me to buy a somewhat decent flatbed scanner that could handle slides and negatives, an Epson V600. It can scan up to four slides at a time with various post-processing options and does a decent enough job.

This set continues a rather large batch of slides that originally came from an estate sale and appear to have belonged to a locally well known photographer (or perhaps a friend or family member) from the Spokane Washington area and later Northern Idaho named Leo Oestreicher. He was known for his portrait and landscape photography and especially for post cards. His career started in the 1930s and he died in 1990. These slides contain a lot of landscape and portrait photos but also a lot of photos from day to day life and various vacations around the world. Here's an article on him from 1997 which is the only info I have found on him: http://www.spokesman.com/stories/1997/jan/04/photos-of-a-lifetime-museum-acquisition-of-leo/

Many of these slides had the date they were processed stamped or printed on them. I've found that in cases where I could verify the date, either because a more specific date was hand written or there was something to specifically date the photo in the photo itself, that this date has typically been the same month the photos were taken. In other words, I expect that in MOST cases these photos were taken relatively near the processing date.

ck on one of the images or the link below to also see versions processed with color restoration and Digital ICE which is a hardware based dust and scratch remover, a feature of the Epson V600 scanner I am using. There are also versions processed with the simpler dust removal option along with color restoration.

The second photo features a stained glass window in University Methodist Church and is dated 1950. The last photo is of a cat named Teddy in a box dated December 1952. The other photos are unlabeled but likely from the same general time period.




Window - Univ. Meth. Church - 1950


Teddy In Box - DEC 1952

entire collection that has been scanned and uploaded so far can also be found here.

Wednesday, August 4, 2021

Amiga World (March/April 1986)

Amiga World (March/April 1986)
Amiga World was probably the most popular Amiga magazine in the U.S. The March/April 1986 issue was the second publicly available issue and includes:

Features

  • Interactive Videodisc Technology - The laser disc and the Amiga are about to join forces and a new world of interactive video computing will be upon us.

  • VIVA from Knowledge - Creating interactive video software on the Amiga with the VIVA authoring program.

  • Success Story: A-Squared Systems and the Amiga Digitizer - How a small group of people with an idea developed Live!, the Amiga video digitizer.

  • Optical Revolution - There is more than music going on in the world of the compact disk.

  • Amiga Software Market - The flood of software for the Amiga is just starting. We put together a list of over 100 titles to whet your appetite.

Articles

  • Basic Graphics - Show off a little with these ABasiC graphics teasers.

  • Programming on the Amiga: MCC Pascal - Here we take a look at one of the most popular programming languages - MCC Pascal for the Amiga.

  • CD-ROM: The Future of Memory? - Megabytes and gigabytes...CD-ROM is going to change the way we think about memory.

  • Amiga Music Studio - Mimetics Inc. is working on a series of music modules for assembling Amiga arias.

  • Using Your Intuition - Relating to the Amiga should be almost intuitive, and with a few pointers, it is.

  • Enabling Amiga - We talked with people from The Software Group about their Enable/Write word processor for the Amiga.

Columns

  • Avision - Bringing all the pieces together.

  • Zeitgeist - How much is a gigabyte anyway?

  • Reviews - Deluxe Paint from Electronic Arts, The Video RoomMate Powered Speaker System from Bose and MaxiComm from MaxiSoft.

  • The Best of Public Domain - A new series featuring reviews of "freeware" and "shareware" available to the public.

Departments

  • Repartee - More letters from readers.

  • Digital Canvas - Selected Amiga art from selected Amiga artists.

  • What's New? - Flashes from the front lines in the Amiga product wars.

  • Help Key - Questions about the Amiga, answered by the expers.

  • Coming Next Issue
...and more!

Tuesday, August 3, 2021

Biden Administration’s New ‘Woke’ Corporate Disclosure Rules Will Cost Companies Billions, Experts Warn

Under the Biden administration’s leadership, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed new “woke” corporate disclosure rules. A new form of social-justice-based financial regulation, the federal agency’s rules would mandate that companies track, report, and disclose a wide array of data on issues such as climate change emissions and diversity. 

This might poll well or look nice at first glance. But like any complex federal regulation, the woke reporting rules will have many unintended consequences—namely, they’ll cost businesses billions.

Business groups are trying to calculate just how much money public companies might have to shell out to comply with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s planned new ‘woke’ corporate disclosure rules, and initial estimates aren’t pretty,” Fox Business reports.While no exact estimate can be determined, the SEC’s new disclosure mandates involving everything from the environment to board diversity is likely to cost U.S. public companies well into the billions of dollars.” 

The goal of the SEC regulation is to promote environmentalism and racial equality, with regulators likely having good intentions. But they are either unable or unwilling to foresee the adverse consequences that could accompany this virtue-signaling effort.

Heritage Foundation senior fellow David R. Burton, a specialist in tax and financial regulation, laid out the many ways these rules will likely backfire in a letter to the SEC. 

He agreed that “requiring all public companies to develop climate modeling expertise, the ability to make macroeconomic projections based on these models and then make firm-specific economic assessments based on these climate and economic models will be expensive,” likely costing billions.  

The result? 

“These expenses would harm investors by reducing shareholder returns,” Burton explained. This means it’s not just Big Business, but the millions of Americans who invest in the stock market or rely on it for their retirement, who could bear the costs. 

Burton further warns that these woke disclosure rules would result in “the creation of a new compliance eco-system and pro-complexity lobby composed of the economists, accountants, attorneys and compliance officers that live off of [regulatory compliance].” Simply put, they would even further entrap firms into wasting money on red tape compliance costs. 

The Heritage expert also added that the rules would fuel a huge rise in costly litigation.

Meanwhile, it’s unclear what, if anything, the SEC’s woke disclosure mandates would accomplish—beyond merely virtue-signaling, of course. 

"This whole ESG thing is just one giant waste of time and money," said Chris Whalen, chief of Whalen Global Advisors. "It’s just a big show that only benefits the consultants and the lawyers who are making money off of this.”

Like this story? Click here to sign up for the FEE Daily and get free-market news and analysis like this from Policy Correspondent Brad Polumbo in your inbox every weekday. 

Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo

Brad Polumbo (@Brad_Polumbo) is a libertarian-conservative journalist and Policy Correspondent at the Foundation for Economic Education.

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

Biden Administration’s New ‘Woke’ Corporate Disclosure Rules Will Cost Companies Billions, Experts Warn