steem

Showing posts with label licenses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label licenses. Show all posts

Monday, January 23, 2023

Occupational Licenses Are Killing Minority Entrepreneurship

Ashley N’Dakpri runs Afro Touch, a hair-braiding salon in Louisiana. She wants to hire more stylists to meet demand, but Louisiana’s strict occupational licensing regulations prevent her from doing so.

Ashley legally isn’t allowed to hire new stylists unless they have a cosmetologist’s license, a certification that requires five hundred hours of training and thousands of dollars in fees to obtain. She notes that many potential employees are no longer interested in working for her once they discover the onerous occupational licensing requirements.

State-level occupational licenses are a major barrier to minority entrepreneurship. These licenses prevent many minorities from starting their own businesses in fields across the economic spectrum.

The beauty industry is perhaps the most egregious example of a field whose occupational licensing requirements prevent minority entrepreneurship, but these licenses are also found in many other industries popular with minority entrepreneurs, including construction, childcare, and pest control.

Cosmetology licenses are often far more difficult to get than licenses for professions that deal with life and death. In Massachusetts, for instance, cosmetologists must complete one thousand hours of coursework and two years of apprenticeship before they are allowed to ply their trade in the beauty industry. Emergency medical technicians, by contrast, must only take 150 hours of courses to be allowed to work.

What are these occupational licenses protecting consumers from? A bad hair day? These permits present an enormous entrepreneurial barrier to mostly minority women. According to a study by the Institute of Justice, Louisiana has just thirty-two licensed African hair braiders. In stark contrast, neighboring Mississippi, which has approximately four hundred thousand fewer black residents but doesn’t regulate hair braiding, has 1,200.

California is the worst occupational licensing offender, according to IJ, putting up “a nearly impenetrable thicket of bureaucracy.” Basic trades such as door repair, carpentry, and landscaping require potential entrepreneurs to devote 1,460 days to supervised practice and spend up to thousands of dollars for a license before they can legally work.

Nearly one-quarter of American workers hold a license, according to the Labor Department, up from about 5 percent in the 1950s. Unsurprisingly, a Federal Reserve Bank of Minnesota report concluded that minorities are significantly less likely to hold a license than whites.

Research by economist Stephen Slivinski indicates that licensing requirements reduce minority entrepreneurship. He finds that states that require more occupational licenses have lower rates of low-income entrepreneurship.

It’s already difficult enough for minority entrepreneurs to find a product that fills a gap in the market and outcompete established players without simultaneously worrying about the government hamstringing them through bad policies like excessive occupational licensing.

With fewer government hurdles, minority entrepreneurs can more readily overcome racial economic gaps through their own inspiration and ingenuity.

This column is adapted from the author’s new book, "The Real Race Revolutionaries: How Minority Entrepreneurship Can Overcome America's Racial and Economic Divides.”

Alfredo Ortiz
Alfredo Ortiz

Alfredo Ortiz is the president and CEO of Job Creators Network.

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

Occupational Licenses Are Killing Minority Entrepreneurship

Friday, February 3, 2017

Got a License for that YouTube Channel?

Got a License for that YouTube Channel?

Justin Chandler was shocked and confused when he was given a citation for operating a business out of his home without first obtaining a license.

Unlike many people who run home-based businesses, Chandler doesn’t actually sell anything. In fact, he doesn’t even provide a service. He does, however, run a successful YouTube channel, which, according to officials in Cobb County, Georgia, means Chandler qualifies as a small business owner.

Internet Famous

Known to his subscribers as “KOSDFF,” Chandler has become a well-known personality in the world of online gaming. In only a few short years, he has gained hundreds of thousands of social media followers and almost a million YouTube subscribers.  

Capitalizing on his channel’s popularity, Chandler was able to monetize his views and earn enough money to quit his day job and focus on creating video content full-time.

While many would applaud his drive and entrepreneurial spirit, the county has instead chosen to reprimand Chandler and his roommates for earning a living without first seeking the government’s permission.   

Recently, Chandler and five of his fellow vloggers decided to move in together in order to spend even more time working on their projects, with the ultimate goal of earning more money. Choosing a home in Cobb County, Georgia, the roommates had no idea they were violating any local statutes.

A Pesky Neighbor

Unfortunately, multiple roommates meant multiple cars parked in the driveway and on the street, which bothered several neighbors. Instead of doing the neighborly thing, and expressing their concerns to Chandler and his roommates directly, the residents took their complaint straight to their local homeowners association, who in turn went straight to county officials.

Originally, the complaint was based on local zoning laws which classified Chandler’s home as a “single family dwelling.” Since Chandler and his colleagues are not related, this gave the country cause to dig deeper into the situation.

Upon discovering that Chandler and his roommates were all professional YouTube personalities, the county sent the vloggers a citation threatening to fine the housemates $136 per day and evict them if they refused to comply with their demands.

When Dana Johnson, director of Cobb County’s Community Development Agency was asked about the situation, she stated, “If he is producing content and receiving revenue from the content produced at his home, then he is running a business and must file for a business license.” She continued, “Just because he makes an occupation in a manner that is new and innovative does not relieve him of his obligation to pay business taxes, just as all other businesses are required to do.”

Everybody's Tube

Every day, millions of Americans upload videos to YouTube and it is safe to speculate that a majority of these individuals do not have business licenses. For vloggers who have been able to monetize their channels, there is also no absolute certainty that they will reach the same levels of success as Chandler. In many cases, monetization means earning somewhere around $1 per 25 views.

If Cobb County believes that any amount of revenue constitutes a need to obtain a business license, as their own representative stated, then those bringing in only mediocre funds may also be forced to obtain licenses that may cost more than the revenue they are generating.  

Enforcing this law locally in Cobb County, Georgia might seem insignificant, but setting this precedent could very well impact the entire vlogging community.

If there is one thing all governments love, it’s finding a way to profit from the success of entrepreneurs. If Cobb County can penalize Chandler and his roommates, it is only a matter of time before other local municipalities begin cracking down on their vloggers as well.  

Chandler expressed his thoughts on the matter saying, “This extremely unique and rare scenario poses the question: [Does] filming and uploading YouTube videos from your home constitute the home as a business? Does it matter how many views I have or how much income I make from it? Because to be honest, I do the same thing millions of other Americans do.”

Brittany Hunter
Brittany Hunter is an associate editor at FEE.

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.